Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-12524
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (educational)
DOI: 10.26044/ecr2025/C-12524
Authorblock: I. Azouz, M. Y. Moussaoui, A. Etteyeb, D. S. Dahech, A. Aissa; Kairouan/TN
Disclosures:
Ines Azouz: Nothing to disclose
Marwa Yaakoubi Moussaoui: Nothing to disclose
Ali Etteyeb: Nothing to disclose
Dhia Sadeg Dahech: Nothing to disclose
Amene Aissa: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Emergency, Musculoskeletal spine, Trauma, CT, MR, Education, Structured reporting, Trauma
Findings and procedure details

I.Mechanisms of injury according to the TLICS:

The TLICS classification system provides a spine injury severity score that is based on 3 items: injury morphology, integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) and neurologic status of the patient.

The total assigned TLICS score represents a prognostic value and guide the indication of surgical management. This classification system focuses on the importance of stable vs instable injuries, instable injuries being those with implication of the PLC and where spine injuries are more frequent, and thus emphases on the important role of MRI. It also acknowledges that the patient’s neurological status is the main driver of surgical intervention.

Fig 1: TLICS scoring system.

A) Injury Morphology :

TLICS identifies three mechanisms of fractures: compression, translation/rotation, and distraction fractures.

Fig 2: Mechanisms of injury based on TLICS include (A) compression fractures, (B) translation/rotation fractures, and (C) distraction fractures.

Compression injuries are characterized by a loss of vertebral height or disruption of the vertebral endplate. Less severe cases affect only the anterior portion of the vertebra, while more severe cases result in burst fractures involving the posterior vertebral body. These may include retropulsion or the presence of osseous fragments in the spinal canal, potentially leading to spinal cord compression. These injuries are primarily caused by axial loading.

Fig 3: VR reconstruction in (A), (B), coronal view in (C), demonstrating an anterior compression fracture due to flexion with an intact posterior wall.

Translation injuries involve the horizontal displacement or rotation of one vertebral body relative to another. These injuries result from torsional or shear forces and are marked by the rotation of spinous processes, unilateral or bilateral facet fracture-dislocations, and vertebral subluxations.

Fig 4: Thoracic spine injury in a 37-year-old man who was an unrestrained passenger in a motor vehicle collision. A sagittal CT image in a bone window shows a translation injury of D6 with 2 cm of vertebral body overlap.
Fig 5: Axial CT slices and VR image of the same patient showing vertebral overlap.
Fig 6: Sagittal CT scan in bone window involved in a road traffic accident with paraplegia showing a complete dislocation of D5 and D6, with a comminuted fracture-dislocation of D6, detachment of multiple intra-canal bone fragments, and fracture-dislocation of the corresponding posterior articular processes Fractures of the spinous processes from D2 to D6.

Distraction injuries are identified on imaging by anatomic separation along the vertical axis. They may occur through the anterior and posterior supporting ligaments, the osseous elements, or a combination of both. A Chance fracture, also known as “seatbelt fracture”, is a flexion-distraction injury involving all three spinal columns (anterior, middle, and posterior). It is commonly associated with intra-abdominal injuries, particularly affecting the pancreas, duodenum, and traumatic arterial dissections, with the superior mesenteric artery being most frequently involved.

Fig 7: CT scans in bone window settings: sagittal view (A) and coronal views (B), (C), and (D) showing a Chance “seatbelt” fracture with a trans osseous trajectory (red arrows in A) through the vertebral body (yellow arrows in B), the pedicles (white arrows in C), and the spinous process (blue arrow in D).

Distraction fractures in hyperextension are the most frequently observed in patients with a rigid spine. The fracture line may be trans osseous, osseous and ligamentous, or trans discal. In cases of ankylosing spondylitis, the fracture line is often trans discal. These fractures are highly unstable and are commonly accompanied by neurological complications with the rates of such complications ranging from 33% to 58% in thoracic and lumbar regions [2,3].

Fig 8: Hyperextension fracture in a 36-year-old man with undiagnosed ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who fell from a cart and presented with paraplegia. A sagittal spine reformatted CT image in a bone window shows a hyperextension fracture (white arrow) at the D4-D5 disk extending through the posterior elements in the left D4-D5 ankylosed facet joint. Diffuse ankylosis of the facet joints (red arrows) and bridging syndesmophytes (blue arrow). Note the presence of an air bubble in the spinal canal.

When multiple injury morphologies are present, the injury with the highest score is used for classification. In cases where injuries involve multiple levels, each injury is evaluated individually.

B) PLC status:

PLC plays a vital role in maintaining spinal stability. It comprises the supraspinous ligament, interspinous ligament, facet capsules, and ligamentum flavum, collectively functioning as the spine's posterior tension band.

Fig 9: Normal anatomic configuration of the PLC, which includes the supraspinous ligament, interspinous ligament, facet capsules, and ligamentum flavum. Reference : Khurana B, Sheehan SE, Sodickson A, Bono CM, Harris MB. Traumatic Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries: What the Spine Surgeon Wants to Know. RadioGraphics. nov 2013;33(7):2031‑46.

The PLC protects the spinal column from excessive flexion, rotation, translation, and distraction forces. The TLICS places significant emphasis on assessing PLC integrity, as these structures have limited healing potential and typically require surgical intervention when disrupted. Disruption of PLC is suggested on CT scans by findings such as widening of the interspinous space, avulsion fractures at the superior or inferior edges of adjacent spinous processes, widening, perched or dislocated facet joints, and vertebral body translation or rotation.

C) Neurological status :

The patient's neurologic status is a crucial factor in assessing the severity of spinal column injuries. The TLICS system assigns scores based on neurologic status, with 0 points for intact function, 2 points for nerve root or complete spinal cord injury, and 3 points for incomplete spinal cord injury or cauda equina syndrome. The higher score for incomplete injuries reflects a greater potential for surgical benefit.

It is also important to highlight that the CT scan plays a vital role in postoperative evaluation, especially in confirming the fracture reduction and ensuring the correct positioning of the orthopedic fixation devices.

Fig 10: CT scans of a patient who underwent thoracic spine instrumentation including midline decompression and posterior instrumentation with pedicle screws and rods in bone window settings: axial views (A) and (B), and sagittal view (C) showing a variant placement of a thoracic pedicle screw (A), where the tip of the right screw at the level of D2 reaches beyond the anterolateral vertebral body cortex coming into contact with the posterior wall of the trachea (yellow arrow). In (B) variant screw placement in the left pedicle at the level of D2, traversing the left lateral recess of the spinal canal (red arrow).

II. Role of MRI :

Even though CT scans can predict the rupture of the posterior ligamentous complex, MRI remains the gold standard for its assessment [4].

The MRI protocol includes sagittal T1, T2, T2*, and STIR sequences, along with axial T2/T2* sequences. The gradient echo sequence plays a critical role in detecting susceptibility effects, which are indicative of cord hemorrhage or hematoma.

Fig 11: MRI protocol in patients with spine trauma.

The ligamentum flavum and the supraspinous ligament are evaluated on sagittal T1, T2, sequences as low-signal-intensity continuous black stripes. The interspinous ligament is visualized on STIR sequences. The involvement of the capsuloligamentous structures of the posterior facets is assessed on axial T2/FS sequences. A complete ligament rupture is indicated by a hypersignal on T2-weighted images with disruption of ligamentous continuity whereas STIR an edematous signal with no visible structural changes are indicative of partial tears or ligament strains and considered as indeterminate finding according to the TLICS and thus given a score of 2.

A) Acute cord injury :

Traumatic spinal cord injuries vary and range from a spinal cord concussion, which is invisible on imaging, to complete spinal cord transection [5]. Spinal cord edema appears as a high T2 signal and a normal or low T1 signal within the cord. Hemorrhagic cord contusion appears as a central intramedullary focus of low signal T2* within the cord, surrounded by a thick rim of hyperintensity on T2W or T2*W GRE imaging, indicating edema. If the lesion exceeds 4mm in size, it is classified as a cord hematoma. In contrast, edematous contusion shows only the intramedullary hypersignal on T2 [5]. Cord transection is the most severe type of spinal cord injury, characterized by a complete disruption of the cord. High-signal cerebrospinal fluid is visible between the severed ends of the cord on T2W images.

Fig 12: MR scan of the same patient in Figure 6 in STIR sequence showing a complete transection of the spinal cord at the D4-D6 level, with contused edges at the site of the transection (red arrows). Rupture of the anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments, the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments, and the ligamentum flavum, with infiltration of the surrounding soft tissues around the fractures.

B) ligamentous injury :

Spinal ligaments typically appear as low signal intensity bands on imaging. Ligamentous tears can be partial, showing high signal areas on STIR images due to edema and hemorrhage, with some intact fibers, or complete, where there is a total loss of intact fibers and high signal intensity from associated edema and hemorrhage [6].

C) Extra medullary hemorrhage and fluid collections:

Extradural hematoma is the most common type of extra-medullary collection in trauma patients. Subdural hematoma and subarachnoid hemorrhage are less common. Other rare complications of spinal trauma include pseudomeningoceles and extradural fluid collections resulting from dural tears.

Fig 13: Axial slice in FIESTA sequence (A) and (B) showing a fracture of the right lamina of L5 (white arrow) , with a dural defect (red arrow) and a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulous tract, along with a subcutaneous CSF collection associated with a post-traumatic pseudomeningocele (red cercle). (C) Coronal myelogram showing the pseudomeningocele along with the fistulous CSF tract.

D) Vascular injuries:

In thoracolumbar spine trauma, injuries to the aorta and its branches can occur, particularly in cases of Chance fractures. Imaging findings of vascular injuries include the presence of an intimal flap, pseudoaneurysm, dissection with intramural hematoma, complete occlusion, and active extravasation.

GALLERY