Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-23680
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock: S. M. R. S. Islam1, A. Biguri2, C. Landi3, G. Di Domenico4, P. Grün5, D. Turhani5, G. Kronreif1, W. Birkfellner6, S. Hatamikia7; 1Wiener Neustadt/AT, 2Cambridge/UK, 3Via Bolgara 2, Brusaporto (BG)/IT, 4Ferrara/IT, 5Steiner Landstraße 124, Krems/AT, 6Vienna/AT, 7Krems/AT
Disclosures:
S M Ragib Shahriar Islam: Nothing to disclose
Ander Biguri: Nothing to disclose
Claudio Landi: Nothing to disclose
Giovanni Di Domenico: Nothing to disclose
Pascal Grün: Nothing to disclose
Dritan Turhani: Nothing to disclose
Gernot Kronreif: Nothing to disclose
Wolfgang Birkfellner: Nothing to disclose
Sepideh Hatamikia: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Interventional non-vascular, Cone beam CT, Digital radiography, CAD, Cost-effectiveness, Experimental investigations, Image verification, Kv imaging
Methods and materials

Digital Imaging Phantom: A digital anthropomorphic head phantom was utilized for computational analysis.

  • Naso-occipital length: 23 cm
  • Cranial breadth: 16 cm

Fig 2: The anthropomorphic phantom and its digital version

Device Geometry: The CBCT unit has the following geometry:

  • Isocenter-to-source distance: 38 cm
  • Isocenter-to-detector distance: 17 cm
  • A translational isocenter movement space was designed, taking into account kinematic constraintsconsidering the detector movement. This space is an 11 × 6 cm rectangular isocenter movable area starting 1 cm behind the bite point.
  • With this geometry, currently only a limited-angle circular scan (approximately 270°) is achievable.

Fig 3: The geometry of the experimental device [1]

Source-Detector Trajectory Development: The proposed trajectory integrates two distinct scanning principles to acquire projections that enable the reconstruction of a larger imaging volume:

Principle 1: Modified Elliptical Isocenter Moving Scan

  • This scan follows a modified elliptical pattern with tangential projection angles based on [2].
  • Limitation: If the ellipse axis becomes too large, the reconstruction can result in a donut-shaped 3D region due to insufficient X-ray beams passing through the center of the field of view (FOV).

Fig 4: The shifted iso-center (in the elliptical path) and tangential projection angle scan trajectory

Principle 2: ROI-guided Optimized Scanning Based on Tuy’s Condition

According to Tuy's condition [3]:

  • Every 3D voxel in the imaging volume must be intersected by an infinite number of X-rays from different directions.
  • The X-rays should intersect the 3D voxels at a perpendicular angle to the tangent line drawn at the boundary of the volume of interest (VOI).

To meet these conditions as closely as possible, an ROI-guided algorithm was developed. This algorithm collects projections from a second elliptical iso-center placeable region positioned almost outside the original isocenter movement region.

Fig 5: The ROI-guided Tuy’s condition-based trajectory for scan data compensation.

Combining the scans to construct the fusion trajectory and reconstructing the images:

  • Projection data from both scanning methods are combined to construct the proposed fusion trajectory, and an iterative reconstruction algorithm is applied to generate a 3D image.
  • All trajectory and reconstruction simulations were performed using the TIGRE toolbox(MATLAB-GPU-based) [4].
  • The Ordered-Subset Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (OS-SART) iterative reconstruction technique from TIGRE was employed in this study.

Fig 6: The proposed fusion trajectory.

 

GALLERY