Congress:
ECR24
Poster Number:
C-14580
Type:
EPOS Radiologist (educational)
DOI:
10.26044/ecr2024/C-14580
Authorblock:
L. Montesinos Aguayo, S. Abiad Sosa, D. Medina Morales, B. Martos Rodriguez, C. Gómez De Las Heras, D. Calvo Gijón, B. Fernandez Gordillo, A. FERNANDEZ ARGUELLES, S. Rico Gala; Sevilla/ES
Disclosures:
Lucia Montesinos Aguayo:
Nothing to disclose
Samer Abiad Sosa:
Nothing to disclose
Daniela Medina Morales:
Nothing to disclose
Beatriz Martos Rodriguez:
Nothing to disclose
Cristina Gómez De Las Heras:
Nothing to disclose
Daniel Calvo Gijón:
Nothing to disclose
Borja Fernandez Gordillo:
Nothing to disclose
AMAYA FERNANDEZ ARGUELLES:
Nothing to disclose
Susana Rico Gala:
Nothing to disclose
Keywords:
Breast, Mammography, Contrast agent-intravenous, Diagnostic procedure, Cancer
In conclusion, this study emphasizes the importance of the “triple test” (physical examination, imaging and pathology) and the use of more than one imaging modality in the assessment of patients with breast symptoms, particularly in the presence of dense fibroglandular tissue. The results demonstrate that the most common type of breast cancer with negative CEM results is infiltrating breast cancer. Therefore, it may be worth considering performing a biopsy for every microcalcification or suspicious manifestation, with or without contrast enhancement.