Back to the list
Congress: ECR24
Poster Number: C-21969
Type: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock: C. Kremser1, L. Gruber1, M. Dietzel2, B. m. Amort1, M. Daniaux1; 1Innsbruck/AT, 2Erlangen/DE
Disclosures:
Christian Kremser: Nothing to disclose
Leonhard Gruber: Nothing to disclose
Matthias Dietzel: Nothing to disclose
Birgit maria Amort: Nothing to disclose
Martin Daniaux: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Breast, MR, Biopsy, Artifacts
Purpose

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death among women in industrialized countries [1].  To ensure successful treatment early detection and diagnosis are important, which conventionally is performed using x-ray mammography and sonography. Due to the limited sensitivity and specificity of these methods particularly in patients with dense breast parenchyma or postsurgical scars, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a valuable tool in the management of selected breast cancer patients [2-4].

To investigate the artifact sizes of four different breast clip markers (Bard UltraClip Dual Trigger [BU], Somatex TUMARK Professional [TP], Somatex TUMARK Vision [TV], and Devicor Mammatome HydroMARK Breast Biopsy Site Marker [HM]) (Fig. 1), commonly used in our clinical practice on a standard breast-imaging MRI protocol in an in-vitro phantom model and to discuss potential clinical implications of the clip type selected [5, 6].

Fig 1: Photographs of the four biopsy clips: a) TUMARK Professional, b) TUMARK Vision, c) BARD UltraClip Dual Trigger, d) HydroMARK Breast Biopsy Site Marker.
 

GALLERY