Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-12965
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock: L. Kregting1, E. Heijnen1, L. B. Van Den Oever1, L. Pennings1, M. Van Oirsouw2, I. Sechopoulos3, M. Broeders1, F. T. Stream Consortium4; 1Nijmegen/NL, 2Utrecht/NL, 3Nijmegen and Enschede/NL, 4-/NL
Disclosures:
Lindy Kregting: Nothing to disclose
Elle Heijnen: Nothing to disclose
Leonardus Bernardus Van Den Oever: Nothing to disclose
Lian Pennings: Nothing to disclose
M Van Oirsouw: Nothing to disclose
Ioannis Sechopoulos: Speaker: Siemens Healthcare, Canon Medical Grant Recipient: Siemens Healthcare, Canon Medical, Screenpoint Medical, Sectra Benelux, Hologic, Volpara Solutions, Lunit Inc, iCAD, E-COM. Advisory Board: Koning Corp.
Mireille Broeders: Speaker: Hologic, Siemens Healthcare. Grant Recipient: Screenpoint Medical, Sectra Benelux, Hologic, Volpara Solutions, Lunit inc,. iCAD.
For The Stream Consortium: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Breast, Oncology, Professional issues, Mammography, Screening, Workforce
Methods and materials

Out of 44,682 invited screening participants, 18,225 participated in the first round of the STREAM trial. Together with the approximately 100 screening radiographers and 35 screening radiologists involved, they were asked to complete an online survey on the acceptability of DBT screening. Participants reported their experience with DBT screening compared to previous DM screening examinations. This was reported with questions on pain, discomfort, and anxiety on a 4 point Likert scale and a pain score (scale 0-10). Participants were also asked about their intention to participate again in future DBT screening. In addition, a reference group of screening participants currently undergoing DM screening was asked to complete the same questions on pain, discomfort, anxiety, and pain score for comparison. Radiographers and radiologists reported on the ease of use of DBT screening. All provided suggestions for improvement.
GALLERY