Congress:
ECR25
Poster Number:
C-12965
Type:
Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock:
L. Kregting1, E. Heijnen1, L. B. Van Den Oever1, L. Pennings1, M. Van Oirsouw2, I. Sechopoulos3, M. Broeders1, F. T. Stream Consortium4; 1Nijmegen/NL, 2Utrecht/NL, 3Nijmegen and Enschede/NL, 4-/NL
Disclosures:
Lindy Kregting:
Nothing to disclose
Elle Heijnen:
Nothing to disclose
Leonardus Bernardus Van Den Oever:
Nothing to disclose
Lian Pennings:
Nothing to disclose
M Van Oirsouw:
Nothing to disclose
Ioannis Sechopoulos:
Speaker: Siemens Healthcare, Canon Medical Grant Recipient: Siemens Healthcare, Canon Medical, Screenpoint Medical, Sectra Benelux, Hologic, Volpara Solutions, Lunit Inc, iCAD, E-COM. Advisory Board: Koning Corp.
Mireille Broeders:
Speaker: Hologic, Siemens Healthcare. Grant Recipient: Screenpoint Medical, Sectra Benelux, Hologic, Volpara Solutions, Lunit inc,. iCAD.
For The Stream Consortium:
Nothing to disclose
Keywords:
Breast, Oncology, Professional issues, Mammography, Screening, Workforce
Participants have a high acceptability for DBT screening. Their experience is comparable or favourable to DM screening. Many participants reported to have experienced no difference compared to DM. Radiographers were generally content to work with DBT, but radiologists request improvements to enhance workability. Improvements in loading and reading time were suggested. This feedback is being used to improve the second round of DBT screening in the STREAM trial.