Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-14271
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock: M. R. López De La Torre Carretero, M. B. Barrio Piqueras, C. D. Solano, D. A. Zambrano, A. M. Delgado Brito, J. M. Rodríguez Ortega, C. Mbongo, A. Elizalde, L. J. Pina Insausti; Pamplona/ES
Disclosures:
Manuel Rafael López De La Torre Carretero: Nothing to disclose
Miguel Barrio Barrio Piqueras: Nothing to disclose
Carlos Delgado Solano: Nothing to disclose
Daniel Alfonso Zambrano: Nothing to disclose
Adolfo Manuel Delgado Brito: Nothing to disclose
José Marlon Rodríguez Ortega: Nothing to disclose
Carmen Mbongo: Nothing to disclose
Arlette Elizalde: Nothing to disclose
Luis Javier Pina Insausti: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Breast, Oncology, Mammography, MR, Comparative studies, Screening, Staging, Cancer, Neoplasia, Outcomes
References

References

  1. REDECAN RE de R de C (2024) Las cifras del cáncer en España. In: Soc. española Oncol. médica. https://seom.org/images/publicaciones/informes-seom-de-evaluacion-de-farmacos/LAS_CIFRAS_2024.pdf. Accessed 24 Jun 2024
  2. Muradali D, Fletcher GG, Cordeiro E, et al (2023) Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Clinical Practice Guideline. Curr Oncol 30:6255–6270. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30070463
  3. Knopp MV, Weiss E, Sinn HP, et al (1999) Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:260–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<260::AID-JMRI6>3.0.CO;2-7
  4. Carmeliet P, Jain RK (2000) Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature 407:249–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/35025220
  5. ACR (2023) ACR practice parameter for the performance of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast
  6. Mann RM, Cho N, Moy L (2019) Breast MRI: State of the Art. Radiology 292:520–536. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182947
  7. Kim E, Moy L (2023) Preoperative Breast MRI Is Not a Significant Prognostic Factor of Recurrence-Free Survival and Overall Survival in Young Women. Radiology 307:. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230387
  8. Mota BS, Reis YN, de Barros N, et al (2023) Effects of preoperative magnetic resonance image on survival rates and surgical planning in breast cancer conservative surgery: randomized controlled trial (BREAST-MRI trial). Breast Cancer Res Treat 198:447–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-06884-5
  9. Houssami N, Turner RM, Morrow M (2017) Meta-analysis of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical treatment for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 165:273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4324-3
  10. Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al (2012) Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307:1394–404. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.388
  11. Patel BK, Lobbes MBI, Lewin J (2018) Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography: A Review. Semin Ultrasound, CT MRI 39:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2017.08.005
  12. Starkey J, Kobayashi N, Numaguchi Y, Moritani T (2017) Cytotoxic Lesions of the Corpus Callosum That Show Restricted Diffusion: Mechanisms, Causes, and Manifestations. RadioGraphics 37:562–576. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160085
  13. Phillips J, Steinkeler J, Talati K, et al (2018) Workflow Considerations for Incorporation of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Into a Breast Imaging Practice. J Am Coll Radiol 15:881–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.02.012
  14. Patel BK, Gray RJ, Pockaj BA (2017) Potential Cost Savings of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography. Am J Roentgenol 208:W231–W237. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17239
  15. Sung JS, Lebron L, Keating D, et al (2019) Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer. Radiology 293:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182660
  16. Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F, et al (2012) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res 14:R94. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3210
  17. Fallenberg EM, Schmitzberger FF, Amer H, et al (2017) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI – clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation. Eur Radiol 27:2752–2764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4650-6
  18. Phillips J, Mehta TS, Portnow LH, et al (2023) Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Mammography with MRI Utilizing an Enriched Reader Study: A Breast Cancer Study (CONTRRAST Trial). Radiology 309:. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230530
  19. Lobbes MBI, Neeter LMFH, Raat F, et al (2023) The performance of contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in local preoperative staging of invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur J Radiol 164:110881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110881
  20. Sung JS, Li J, Costa G Da, et al (2014) Preoperative Breast MRI for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Effect on Surgical and Long-Term Outcomes. Am J Roentgenol 202:1376–1382. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11355
GALLERY