Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-16634
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock: H. Grover, D. Mogel, A. Kagen, N. Rofsky, C. Chen; New York, NY/US
Disclosures:
Hemal Grover: Nothing to disclose
Daniel Mogel: Nothing to disclose
Alexander Kagen: Nothing to disclose
Neil Rofsky: Nothing to disclose
Christine Chen: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Genital / Reproductive system male, MR, Imaging sequences, Cancer
Results

3T MRI without DLR demonstrated significantly higher SNR and CNR compared to 1.5T MRI with DLR. Mean SNR for 3T group versus1.5T group was 111.3 and 79.5, respectively (p-value 0.04). Mean CNR for 3T group versus 1.5T was 57.8 and 39.2, respectively (p-value 0.02).  

A moderate negative correlation (r=-0.44) was seen between SNR and FT in the 3T without DLR group, while a low degree of negative correlation (r=-0.2) was seen between SNR and FT in the 1.5T with DLR group, however this difference was not significant. Similar negative correlation (r=-0.5) was seen between CNR and FT for both groups. 

GALLERY