Congress:
ECR24
Poster Number:
C-23452
Type:
EPOS Radiographer (scientific)
Authorblock:
M. Koshizuka1, H. Watanabe1, Y. Takeda1, Y. Ezawa1, K. Saito2, N. Hayashi1, M. Sato1, T. Ogura1, M. Shimosegawa1; 1Maebashi/JP, 2Saitama/JP
Disclosures:
Momoko Koshizuka:
Nothing to disclose
Haruyuki Watanabe:
Nothing to disclose
Yuto Takeda:
Nothing to disclose
Yuina Ezawa:
Nothing to disclose
Kazuho Saito:
Nothing to disclose
Norio Hayashi:
Nothing to disclose
Mitsuru Sato:
Nothing to disclose
Toshihiro Ogura:
Nothing to disclose
Masayuki Shimosegawa:
Nothing to disclose
Keywords:
Breast, Mammography, Technology assessment, Image verification
The VGG16 model achieved the highest accuracy in the retromammary space for both ROI sizes. There was not much difference when comparing ROI size. The probability from softmax was confirmed as a value corresponding to the mammographic positioning accuracy.
Fig 6: CAM and softmax values (correct images)
Fig 7: CAM and softmax values (incorrect images)
Table 1: Classification accuracy [%]