Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-22790
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock: C. Carbone, F. Albisinni, C. Zacchi, A. Dalla Volta, A. Berruti, A. Borghesi, N. Di Meo, D. Farina, M. Ravanelli; Brescia/IT
Disclosures:
Carmela Carbone: Nothing to disclose
Flavia Albisinni: Nothing to disclose
Chiara Zacchi: Nothing to disclose
Alberto Dalla Volta: Nothing to disclose
Alfredo Berruti: Nothing to disclose
Andrea Borghesi: Nothing to disclose
Nunzia Di Meo: Nothing to disclose
Davide Farina: Nothing to disclose
Marco Ravanelli: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Bones, MR physics, Oncology, MR, MR-Functional imaging, Diagnostic procedure, Metastases, Neoplasia
Conclusion

WB-MRI demonstrated different patterns of radiological response to the two different therapies. Enzalutamide led to tumor size reduction and increased fat fraction (FF%), suggesting tumor necrosis and bone marrow recovery. In contrast, cabozantinib stabilized lesion size, significantly increased ADC, and maintained stable FF%, indicating enhanced tumor necrosis without changes in bone marrow composition. These differences reflect the distinct mechanisms of action of the two therapies (Fig. 9).

GALLERY