Back to the list
Congress: ECR24
Poster Number: C-14183
Type: EPOS Radiologist (educational)
Authorblock: E. Vall Foraster, P. Miranda Martinez, E. Vila-Trias Jover, H. Puigderrajols Vehils, J. Azcona Sáenz, N. Arenas, R. Alcantara Souza; Barcelona/ES
Disclosures:
Elisenda Vall Foraster: Nothing to disclose
Paulina Miranda Martinez: Nothing to disclose
Elisabet Vila-Trias Jover: Nothing to disclose
Helena Puigderrajols Vehils: Nothing to disclose
Javier Azcona Sáenz: Speaker: Bureau GE Healthcare Speaker: Bard
Natalia Arenas: Speaker: Bard
Rodrigo Alcantara Souza: Speaker: Bard Speaker: Bureau GE Healthcare
Keywords: Breast, Management, Mammography, Contrast agent-intravenous, Diagnostic procedure, Technical aspects, Artifacts
References
  1. Lorente-Ramos RM, Azpeitia-Armán J, Oliva-Fonte C, Pérez-Bartolomé A, Azpeitia Hernández J. Contrast-enhanced Mammography Artifacts and Pitfalls: Tips and Tricks to Avoid Misinterpretation. Radiographics. 2023;43(10):e230021.
  2. Carnahan MB, Harper L, Brown PJ, et al. False-Positive and False-Negative Contrast-enhanced Mammograms: Pitfalls and Strategies to Improve Cancer Detection. Radiographics. 2023;43(12):e230100. 
  3. Amir T, Hogan MP, Jacobs S, Sevilimedu V, Sung J, Jochelson MS. Comparison of False-Positive versus True-Positive Findings on Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022;218(5):797–808.
  4. Nori J, Gill MK, Vignoli C, et al. Artefacts in contrast enhanced digital mammography: how can they affect diagnostic image quality and confuse clinical diagnosis? Insights Imaging 2020;11(1):16.
  5. Jochelson MS, Lobbes MBI. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art. Radiology 2021;299(1):36–48.
  6. Lorente-Ramos R, Azpeitia Armán J. Review of contrast-enhanced mammography. Contemp Diagn Radiol 2022;45(19):1–7.
  7. Neeter LMFH, Raat HPJF, Alcantara R, et al. Contrast-enhanced mammography: what the radiologist needs to know. BJR Open 2021;3(1):20210034.
  8. Wang L, Wang D, Fei X, et al. A rim-enhanced mass with central cystic changes on MR imaging: how to distinguish breast cancer from inflammatory breast diseases? PLoS One 2014;9(3):e90355.
  9. Giess CS, Raza S, Birdwell RL. Distinguishing breast skin lesions from superficial breast parenchymal lesions: diagnostic criteria, imaging characteristics, and pitfalls. RadioGraphics 2011;31(7):1959–1972.
  10. Gluskin J, Click M, Fleischman R, Dromain C, Morris EA, Jochelson MS. Contamination artifact that mimics in-situ carcinoma on contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 2017;95:147–154.
  11. Shimauchi A, Jansen SA, Abe H, Jaskowiak N, Schmidt RA, Newstead GM. Breast cancers not detected at MRI: review of false-negative lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(6):1674–1679.
  12. Canteros D, Walbaum B, Córdova-Delgado M, et al. Contrast-enhanced mammography predicts pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. Ecancermedicalscience. 2022;16:1396.
GALLERY