Back to the list
Congress: ECR24
Poster Number: C-14130
Type: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
DOI: 10.26044/ecr2024/C-14130
Authorblock: C. Boldrini, S. Amodeo, R. Dattoli, A. Marra, P. Belli; Roma/IT
Disclosures:
Cristiana Boldrini: Nothing to disclose
Silvia Amodeo: Nothing to disclose
Roberta Dattoli: Nothing to disclose
Angelica Marra: Nothing to disclose
Paolo Belli: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Breast, CT, MR, PET, Diagnostic procedure, Cancer
References

[1] Gao Y, Brachtel EF, Hernandez O, Heller SL. An Analysis of Nipple Enhancement at Breast MRI with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics. 2019 Jan-Feb;39(1):10-27. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180039. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

[2] Bae SJ, Cha YJ, Eun NL, Ji JH, Kim D, Lee J, Ahn SG, Son EJ, Jeong J. Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonmass Enhancement at Breast MRI in Predicting Tumor Involvement of the Nipple: A Prospective Study in a Single Institution. Radiology. 2021 Oct;301(1):47-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204136. Epub 2021 Jul 13.

[3] Agarwal S, Pappas L, Neumayer L, Kokeny K, Agarwal J. Effect of breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on disease-specific survival for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2014 Mar;149(3):267-74. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3049.

[4] Yoo J, Kim BS, Chung J, Yoon HJ. Clinical value of delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting nipple-areolar complex involvement in breast cancer: A comparison with clinical symptoms and breast MRI. PLoS One. 2018 Sep 12;13(9):e0203649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203649.
GALLERY