Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-24983
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock: A. Parpaleix1, F. Mele2, C. Gange3; 1Paris/FR, 2Meriden, CT/US, 3New Haven, CT/US
Disclosures:
Alexandre Parpaleix: Founder: Milvue
Franck Mele: Nothing to disclose
Christopher Gange: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Thorax, Plain radiographic studies, Computer Applications-Detection, diagnosis, Acute
Results

Patient Demographics and Radiograph Characteristics

For each dataset, 300 cases from 300 unique patients were included. All cases could be processed by SmartChest and were thus included in the per-protocol analysis.

Pneumothorax Dataset

The median age was 56 years old (interquartile range [Q1-Q3]: 34.8-71; range: 18-90). 44.3% were female, 37,7% were aged ≥65 years, and 58.2% were acquired as a PA view.

Among the 150 (50%) pneumothorax cases, 52% were classified as small and 1.5% were bilateral. The most frequent concomitant chest anomalies were pleural effusion (31.7%), catheters or tubes (28.0%), and atelectasis (17.7%). Most imaging sites were located in large urban (37.0%) or community (32.0%) areas. The most represented manufacturers were Samsung (36.5%), Canon (15.0%), Siemens (11.3%), Carestream (10.6%), Fujifilm (6.8%), and GE (5.1%), with other manufacturers each representing <5% of cases.

Pleural Effusion Dataset

The median age was 60 years old (interquartile range [Q1-Q3]: 42-73; range: 18-90). 47.3% were female, 41% were aged ≥65 years, and 63.2% were acquired as a PA view.

Of the 150 (50%) pleural effusion cases, 58% were characterized as small, and the effusions were mostly unilateral (42.6% right-sided and 29.5% left-sided). Most imaging sites were located in urban (40.3%) and large urban (34%) areas.

Standalone Performance of the AI Algorithm

To classify the presence or absence of a suspected pneumothorax, the deep learning (DL) software achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.989 (95% CI: 0.978–0.997), with the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval exceeding the acceptance criterion of 0.95. It yielded 92.7% sensitivity (95% CI: 87.4–96.2) and 97.3% specificity (95% CI: 93.4–99.1).

For pleural effusion, it achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.975 (95% CI: 0.960–0.987) and yielded 93.3% sensitivity (95% CI: 88.1–96.4) and 90.0% specificity (95% CI: 84.1–94.1). A true positive and a false negative results are shown in Figure 1 and 2.

The forest plots in Figures 3 and 4 for pneumothorax and pleural effusion, respectively, provide an overview of the ROC-AUC values for each subgroup and each specific population. The software’s performance remained consistent across all age groups (18–21 years up to ≥65 years), across a variety of imaging systems, and for both frontal view types. For both pleural effusion and pneumothorax, SmartChest’s performance was high and consistent regardless of the lesion’s volume or location.

GALLERY