Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-17860
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock: X. Zhang1, G. Zhang1, H. Sun1, Z. Jin1, J. Yan1, M. Xu1, L. Xu2, J. Zhang1, X. Bai1; 1Beijing/CN, 2Hangzhou/CN
Disclosures:
Xiaoxiao Zhang: Nothing to disclose
Gumuyang Zhang: Nothing to disclose
Hao Sun: Nothing to disclose
Zhengyu Jin: Nothing to disclose
Jing Yan: Nothing to disclose
Min Xu: Nothing to disclose
Lili Xu: Nothing to disclose
Jiahui Zhang: Nothing to disclose
Xin Bai: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Abdomen, Kidney, Urinary Tract / Bladder, CT, Technology assessment, Calcifications / Calculi
Results

In the phantom images, ULD-AICEs exhibited superior detectability of high and low contrast object in all size compared to LD-AIDR images or other ULD images (P < 0.01).

The ULD-AICEs has a significant higher TTF10% of low contrast objects, higher TTF10% and TTF 50% of high contrast objects than that in LD-AIDR images (P < 0.01).
ULD-AICEs also showed a significantly lower NPS than that in LD-AIDR images. In the clinical patients, LD-AIDR detected 129 urinary stones. ULD-AICEs and ULD-AICE both detected 123 stones with highest rate of 95.34%.
The size and attenuation of stones in ULD-AICEs and ULD-AICE didn’t show significant differences from that in LD-AIDR images. Another 64 abdominopelvic lesions were detected in the LD-AIDR images. The lesion detection rate on ULD-AICEs images was highest (92.2%, 60/64). The image quality of ULD-AICEs was best than other images with lowest image noise and highest SNR except in fat and highest average subjective score.

 
GALLERY