Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-14612
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock: N. Jain, P. Chaturvedi, A. Singh, S. Jain, A. Gupta; Lucknow/IN
Disclosures:
Neeraj Jain: Nothing to disclose
Pragya Chaturvedi: Nothing to disclose
Anuradha Singh: Nothing to disclose
Shweta Jain: Nothing to disclose
Archna Gupta: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Cardiac, CT-Angiography, Diagnostic procedure, Arteriosclerosis
References
  1. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:616-626.

    2.  

    1. Barner HB, Standeven JW, Reese J. Twelve-year experience with internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;90:668-75.

     

    1. Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, et al. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts--effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med 1996;334:216-219.

     

    1. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:e123-e210.

     

    1. Sabik JF, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, et al. Comparison of saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery graft patency by coronary system. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:544-51; discussion -51.

     

    1. Bourassa MG, Fisher LD, Campeau L, et al. Long-term fate of bypass grafts: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) and Montreal Heart Institute experiences. Circulation 1985;72(6 Pt 2):V71-78.

     

    1. Sisto T, Isola J. Incidence of atherosclerosis in the internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:884-886.

     

    1. Sabik JF, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH et al. Does competitive flow reduce internal thoracic artery graft patency?. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1490-1497.

     

    1. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A, et al.Evaluation of coronary bypass graft occlusion and stenosis with 64-detector-row computed tomography angiography. Acta Radiol 2007;48(9):988-996.

     

    1. Barbero U, Iannaccone M, d'Ascenzo F, et al. 64 slice-coronary computed tomography sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft stenosis: A meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2016;216:52-57.
    2. Glineur D, Hanet C. Competitive flow in coronary bypass surgery: is it a problem?. Curr Opin Cardiol 2012;27:620-628.

     

    1. Glineur D, D'Hoore W, El Khoury G, et al. Angiographic predictors of 6-month patency of bypass grafts implanted to the right coronary artery a prospective randomized comparison of gastroepiploic artery and saphenous vein grafts. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:120-5.

     

    1. Tinica G, Chistol RO, Enache M, et al. Long-term graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting: Effects of morphological and pathophysiological factors. Anatol J Cardiol 2018;20:275-282.

     

    1. Sabik JF, Blackstone EH. Coronary artery bypass graft patency and competitive flow. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:126-128.

     
GALLERY