Congress:
ECR25
Poster Number:
C-11295
Type:
Poster: EPOS Radiographer (scientific)
Authorblock:
Y. X. Tay1, S. J. Foley2, R. P. Killeen2, M. E. Ong1, R. Chen1, L. P. Chan1, E. J. Tan1, W. Hou1, J. Mcnulty2; 1Singapore/SG, 2Dublin/IE
Disclosures:
Yi Xiang Tay:
Nothing to disclose
Shane J Foley:
Nothing to disclose
Ronan P Killeen:
Shareholder: xWave Technologies Ltd
Marcus Eh Ong:
Nothing to disclose
Robert Chen:
Nothing to disclose
Lai Peng Chan:
Nothing to disclose
Eu Jin Tan:
Nothing to disclose
Wenlu Hou:
Nothing to disclose
Jonathan Mcnulty:
Nothing to disclose
Keywords:
Musculoskeletal spine, Radiographers, Radioprotection / Radiation dose, Conventional radiography, CT, Audit and standards, Health policy and practice, Radiation safety, Outcomes, Quality assurance
The purpose of the study was to retrospectively compare the clinically significant positive and negative rates of cervical spine imaging (imaging characteristics) in the Emergency Department (ED) based on the imaging recommendations from the American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria (AC), the European Society of Radiology (ESR) iGuide, and the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) iRefer and, in tandem, explore the subsequent patient disposition.