Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-11295
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiographer (scientific)
Authorblock: Y. X. Tay1, S. J. Foley2, R. P. Killeen2, M. E. Ong1, R. Chen1, L. P. Chan1, E. J. Tan1, W. Hou1, J. Mcnulty2; 1Singapore/SG, 2Dublin/IE
Disclosures:
Yi Xiang Tay: Nothing to disclose
Shane J Foley: Nothing to disclose
Ronan P Killeen: Shareholder: xWave Technologies Ltd
Marcus Eh Ong: Nothing to disclose
Robert Chen: Nothing to disclose
Lai Peng Chan: Nothing to disclose
Eu Jin Tan: Nothing to disclose
Wenlu Hou: Nothing to disclose
Jonathan Mcnulty: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Musculoskeletal spine, Radiographers, Radioprotection / Radiation dose, Conventional radiography, CT, Audit and standards, Health policy and practice, Radiation safety, Outcomes, Quality assurance
Conclusion

There was variation in the rates of positive significant findings within all the imaging recommendations for cervical spine, with CT identifying a higher number of these positive findings as compared to X-rays. Inappropriate cervical spine imaging was associated with lack of positive significant findings. When imaging is considered inappropriate, imaging referral guidelines can effectively exclude clinically significant injury due to their high specificity. Furthermore, the analysis of patient dispositions suggests that we can omit most of this low-value imaging and still maintain safety and quality of care in the ED. It is therefore vital for imaging referral guidelines to be integrated into clinical practice in the ED, given that low-value imaging is preventable.

GALLERY