Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-21584
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
DOI: 10.26044/ecr2025/C-21584
Authorblock: W. Pettit1, M. Ryan2, A. Raginis-Zborowska2, E. Compton2, A. Kumar1; 1Berkshire and Surrey/UK, 2Sydney/AU
Disclosures:
William Pettit: Nothing to disclose
Melissa Ryan: Employee: Annalise AI
Alicja Raginis-Zborowska: Employee: Annalise AI
Emma Compton: Employee: Annalise AI
Amrita Kumar: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Oncology, Respiratory system, Plain radiographic studies, Computer Applications-Detection, diagnosis, Cancer
Methods and materials

This is the first of a 3-phase AI implementation, to evaluate the performance for the specific population before further implementation is undertaken and understand whether there are any adjustments required.

Fig 1: Phase 1 of a 3-phase AI implementation

A cohort of adult (over 18 years) patients referred from General Practice and Outpatient for a frontal chest radiograph (CXRs) was collected from a single National Health Service Trust retrospectively from examinations conducted from November 2022 - January 2023. The reference index was established by consensus between at least two consultant radiologists. 

The aim of the AI tool is to categorise the radiographs into 1 of 4 categories of findings. Category 1 was any findings related to lung cancer, category 2 was urgent non-cancerous findings, category 3 was any lines and tubes and finally category 4 was chronic or no AI findings. In the analysis, categories 1 & 2 were deemed remarkable and categories 3 & 4 were unremarkable. 

The analysis included basic performance metrics: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV).

GALLERY