Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-14751
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiographer (scientific)
DOI: 10.26044/ecr2025/C-14751
Authorblock: J-M. Bridson, L. R. Jenkins, A. Tootell, L. Williams, G. Holroyd, E. Holme; Ormskirk/UK
Disclosures:
Julie-Michelle Bridson: Research/Grant Support: Funded by NHS England (formerly Health Education England) UK
Liam Rhys Jenkins: Research/Grant Support: Funded by NHS England (formerly Health Education England) UK
Andrew Tootell: Research/Grant Support: Funded by NHS England (formerly Health Education England) UK
Linda Williams: Research/Grant Support: Funded by NHS England (formerly Health Education England) UK
Gill Holroyd: Research/Grant Support: Funded by NHS England (formerly Health Education England) UK
Elaine Holme: Research/Grant Support: Funded by NHS England (formerly Health Education England) UK
Keywords: Management, Radiographers, Plain radiographic studies, Health policy and practice, Structured reporting, Education and training, Workforce
Results

100% questionnaire return rate.

Results, for RRs reporting PFI in NWE.

  • 2/24 2 hospitals did not have RRs.
  • 91% (20/22) hospitals had RRs, 333 by headcount/178 by WTE.
  • 156 WTE RRs reporting PFI for 7.1m population (only 7.8 WTE hospital).
  • 92% reported PFI only; 8% PFI + other modality/ies.
  • Figure 2 shows variation of % RRs in AfC bandings. Expectedly, majority (89%) were Band 7 as been 'adopted' by hospitals as reasonable banding for scope of practice.
  • Table 1, figure 3 show number by headcount reporting PFI in Musculo-skeletal (MSK), chest X-ray (CXR) and abdominal X-ray (AXR) examinations and % combinations of examination types reported. As expected, majority, 56% (99/178) were reporting PFI MSK since it was the original area RRs developed. 10% (18/178) were reporting CXR; 1% (1/178) reporting AXR only.
  • Increase of 278% in numbers reporting PFI CXR between 1997>2017; linked to substantive radiologist support in specific areas of NW England for CXR RRs.
  • Only 76% (mean, range 63-100%) had a job plan, 24% = no job plan (figure 4).
  • 63% (mean, range 50%-75%) specified an expected number of reports/reporting session. Table 2 shows variation in minimum and maximum number of reports expected/session.  

    - 110 exceeds the RCR 2022 guidance for PFI reporting at 80 reports/session [2], which is concerning if RRs are expected to report more reports/session than radiologist colleagues.

  • 81% of the total images reported by RRs were PFI in census period. No double reporting undertaken.
  • 1,168,333 PFI examinations reported by RRs (01/04/2022>31/03/2023); only 23% total reports (all workforce/modalities).
  • No standard minimum qualification required for independent reporting in UK. Anecdotally, a postgraduate certificate adopted. Table 3 shows the range/costs of qualifications achieved.

  • In UK, training programmes for RRs are offered by universities requiring rigorous approval. Initial assessment of competence is essential, with emphasis on reflective practice focused on roles/boundaries and patient safety. Learners are required to have mentorship by a consultant radiologist(s) [5,6]. 

  • Limited number of universities offering such courses in UK; RRs have travel long distances to train with additional costs/absence from work.
  • Figure 5 shows the trend in training for PFI in NW England. There has been a general uptick since 2018-2023, with an erratic/inconsistent pattern of training. This does not allow effective workforce planning and the possible contribution that RRs could make to report output productivity in departments.

  • Figure 6 shows key themes from qualitative thematic analysis.

GALLERY