Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-16938
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock: M. Woisetschlager1, T. Bjerner1, M. Lindblom1, C. Götz2, A. Hummer2, C. Salzlechner2, A. Spångeus1; 1Linköping/SE, 2Vienna/AT
Disclosures:
Mischa Woisetschlager: Nothing to disclose
Tomas Bjerner: Nothing to disclose
Maria Lindblom: Nothing to disclose
Christoph Götz: Employee: IB lab GmbH
Allan Hummer: Employee: IB lab GmbH
Christoph Salzlechner: Employee: IB lab GmbH
Anna Spångeus: Advisory Board: UCB Consultant: Giddeon Richter Speaker: Amgen, Tromp Medical
Keywords: Abdomen, Artificial Intelligence, Computer applications, CT, Computer Applications-General, Osteoporosis
Methods and materials

Cohort: The study utilized 246 existing CT scans originally conducted for purposes unrelated to vertebral assessment but which included the thoracic and/or lumbar spine from a prior study on in-hospital falls. The cohort had a mean age of 84 years (range 62-103) with 42% being female. The CT scans included both women and men, thoracic or abdominal examinations, and were performed with various CT protocols, including bone and non-bone kernel, as well as different contrast phases.

 

Method: AI analysis was performed using IB Lab FLAMINGO software, which detects vertebral fractures through two AI components: vertebra identification (vertebrae number) and fracture detection (moderate-severe VF, Genant grade 2-3). As ground truth, CT scans were evaluated by two independent and experienced radiologists (>15 years of experience).

Fig 1: Output image from the AI algorithm.

Outcome: The comparison between AI and ground truth was conducted for the entire cohort as well as through subgroup analysis, including sex (male:female), age (<85:>85 years), reconstruction kernel (bone kernel:non-bone kernel), examination region (thorax:abdomen), and use of contrast agent (contrast-enhanced:non-contrast-enhanced).

Fig 2: Sub-groups analyzed in the study.

GALLERY