Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-11258
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock: L. Leo1, P. Favia1, C. Marrocchio1, G. Gafà2, E. Verardo2, G. Milanese1, R. Mura1, M. Pedrazzini2, N. Sverzellati1; 1Parma/IT, 2Fidenza/IT
Disclosures:
Ludovica Leo: Nothing to disclose
Pasquale Favia: Nothing to disclose
Cristina Marrocchio: Nothing to disclose
Giuseppe Gafà: Nothing to disclose
Enrica Verardo: Nothing to disclose
Gianluca Milanese: Nothing to disclose
Rebecca Mura: Nothing to disclose
Massimo Pedrazzini: Nothing to disclose
Nicola Sverzellati: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: eHealth, Lung, Oncology, CT, Comparative studies, Staging, Structured reporting, Cancer
Purpose

Structured Reporting (SR) represents a tool for enhancing oncological staging with potential clinical and research benefits.

Three key elements of SR have been defined [1]:

  1. Predefined structure
  2. Logical organization
  3. Standardized terminology

According to the European Society of Radiology (ESR) [2], the introduction of structured reporting in clinical practice offers numerous advantages compared to traditional narrative reporting. The checklist structure of SR ensures methodological rigor, reduces omissions [3] and reporting times, and prevents errors [4]. Several scientific societies promote SR for lung cancer staging since its adoption may enhance the completeness and accuracy of radiological reports and facilitate interpretation [5].

This study aims to assess the applicability and quality of SR for chest CT scans for lung cancer (LC) staging compared with the conventional free narrative reports (NR).
GALLERY