Congress:
ECR25
Poster Number:
ESI-14841
Type:
EuroSafe Imaging Poster
DOI:
10.26044/ecr2025/ESI-14841
Authorblock:
R. W. Loose1, E. Vaño2, J. Ammon1, J. S. Andersson3, H. Brat4, B. Brkljačić5, K. Caikovska6, R. Corridori7, J. Damilakis8; 1Nürnberg/DE, 2Madrid/ES, 3Umeå/SE, 4Tournai/BE, 5Zagreb/HR, 6Riga/LV, 7Bruxelles/BE, 8Iraklion/GR
Disclosures:
Reinhard W.R. Loose:
Nothing to disclose
Eliseo Vaño:
Nothing to disclose
Josefin Ammon:
Nothing to disclose
Jonas Seth Andersson:
Nothing to disclose
Hugues Brat:
Nothing to disclose
Boris Brkljačić:
Nothing to disclose
Katrina Caikovska:
Nothing to disclose
Riccardo Corridori:
Nothing to disclose
John Damilakis:
Nothing to disclose
Keywords:
Radioprotection / Radiation dose, CT, PACS, RIS, Dosimetry, Physics, Radiation safety, Quality assurance
Despite the great advantages of dose management systems for optimising radiation protection, distribution remains insufficient. This questionnaire shows that reasons include: a lack of DICOM interfaces, insufficient harmonisation of procedure names (main problem), lack of medical physicist and IT support, and costs. The results of the questionnaire have been published [5]. With the results of an IAEA publications and questionnaire on technical aspects of DMS systems [6, 7], the next step of the WG will be to provide concrete recommendations on DMS implementation and to what extent artificial intelligence AI could help in the future.