Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-11985
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock: R. Calandrelli1, D. De Lucia2, M. Gessi1, G. D'Apolito1, F. Doglietto2, S. Chiloiro2, S. Gaudino1; 1Roma/IT, 2Rome/IT
Disclosures:
Rosalinda Calandrelli: Nothing to disclose
Diletta De Lucia: Nothing to disclose
Marco Gessi: Nothing to disclose
Gabriella D'Apolito: Nothing to disclose
Francesco Doglietto: Nothing to disclose
Sabrina Chiloiro: Nothing to disclose
Simona Gaudino: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Neuroradiology brain, MR, Comparative studies, Contrast agent-intravenous, Imaging sequences, Neoplasia
References
  1. Buchfelder M, Schlaffer SM, Zhao Y (2019) The optimal surgical techniques for pituitary

    2. tumors. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 33:101299.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2019.101299

    1. Micko ASG, Wöhrer A, Wolfsberger S, Knosp E (2015) Invasion of the cavernous sinus

    space in pituitary adenomas: endoscopic verification and its correlation with an MRI-based

    classification. J Neurosurg 122:803–811. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.12.JNS141083

    1. Fang Y, Pei Z, Chen H, et al (2021) Diagnostic value of Knosp grade and modified Knosp

    grade for cavernous sinus invasion in pituitary adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Pituitary 24:457–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-020-01122-3

    1. Cottier JP, Destrieux C, Brunereau L, et al (2000) Cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary

    adenoma: MR imaging. Radiology 215:463–469.

    https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ap18463

    1. Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C (1993) Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the

    cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical

    findings. Neurosurgery 33:610–617; discussion 617-618.  https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-

    199310000-00008

    1. Freda PU, Beckers AM, Katznelson L, et al (2011) Pituitary incidentaloma: an endocrine

    society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:894–904.

    https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-1048

    1. Trouillas J, Roy P, Sturm N, et al (2013) A new prognostic clinicopathological classification

    of pituitary adenomas: a multicentric case-control study of 410 patients with 8 years post-operative

    follow-up. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 126:123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1084-y

    1. Calandrelli R, Pilato F, D’Apolito G, et al (2023) MRI and Trouillas’ grading system of

    pituitary tumors: the usefulness of T2 signal intensity volumetric values. Neuroradiology.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-023-03162-5
GALLERY