Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-21805
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiographer (scientific)
Authorblock: S. Décombas-Deschamps1, M. Dioguardi Burgio2, C. Tescher1, M. Dabbas1, B. Pradier1, A. Vallet Pichard1, A. Tissier1, L. Rouet1, J. M. Correas1; 1Paris/FR, 2Clichy/FR
Disclosures:
Sofiane Décombas-Deschamps: Nothing to disclose
Marco Dioguardi Burgio: Nothing to disclose
Clara Tescher: Nothing to disclose
Myriam Dabbas: Nothing to disclose
Basile Pradier: Nothing to disclose
A Vallet Pichard: Nothing to disclose
AM Tissier: Nothing to disclose
Laurence Rouet: Nothing to disclose
Jean Michel Correas: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Abdomen, Liver, MR, Ultrasound, Computer Applications-Detection, diagnosis, Tissue characterisation
Conclusion

The variability of liver stiffness biomarker quantified by ultrasound (SWE) is equivalent to that of MRI (MR-E). However, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test demonstrated that all variability coefficients computed on liver fat biomarkers were significantly different between MR-PDFF (from ROI1 and ROI2) and US-ATI, on the three different populations: the full cohort, teenagers, or adults only, with higher variability coming from MR-PDFF measurements than US-ATI.

In addition, MR-PDFF were significantly different in adults and teenagers whereas US-ATI variability was not significantly different between populations. The higher MR-PDFF variability observed in teenagers compared to adults could result from higher BMI and breathing artifacts. On the contrary, US-ATI seems to be less sensitive to artifacts as the US-ATI variability coefficients are the same on the two groups. There was no significant difference between VCs from the teenager and adult groups, for stiffness biomarkers (MR-E and SWE).

GALLERY