The methods of Fallopian Tube Recanalization utilized in the study included two primary approaches: hydrosalpingoscopy and laparoscopic surgery. Hydrosalpingoscopy involves the use of a small catheter inserted through the cervix, which then injects saline or contrast medium to visualize and clear the blocked tubes under fluoroscopic guidance. On the other hand, laparoscopic FTR involves direct visualization and surgery on the tubes, with the use of laser or mechanical dilation techniques to remove blockages or adhesions.

Patient selection for the procedures was based on a thorough pre-procedure assessment, including history-taking, imaging studies, and laboratory tests. We also categorized patients based on the severity and location of the tubal obstruction, which were classified as proximal (near the uterus), distal (near the ovary), or fimbrial (near the end of the fallopian tube).

In addition to the clinical procedures, we employed *patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to gauge the psychological and emotional effects of the procedure. This included administering questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction, perceived quality of life, and emotional well-being before and after the procedure.

The primary outcome of this study is the pregnancy rate following Fallopian Tube Recanalization, as well as the live birth ratewithin one year of the procedure. Secondary outcomes include **omplication rates, including infection, re-obstruction, and adverse reactions to anesthesia. The data were analyzed using statistical methods such as Chi-square tests and Cox regression analysis to identify predictors of success and failure in recanalization procedures.