Back to the list
Congress: ECR24
Poster Number: C-15511
Type: EPOS Radiologist (educational)
DOI: 10.26044/ecr2024/C-15511
Authorblock: B. Ergin, D. Sungur, O. Şahin, E. Aydin, H. Şahin; Izmir/TR
Disclosures:
Begüm Ergin: Nothing to disclose
Damla Sungur: Nothing to disclose
Olgun Şahin: Nothing to disclose
Elçin Aydin: Nothing to disclose
Hilal Şahin: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Abdomen, Genital / Reproductive system female, MR, Education, Education and training
References

1-Agostinho, L., Cruz, R., Osório, F., Alves, J., Setúbal, A., & Guerra, A. (2017). MRI for adenomyosis: a pictorial review. Insights into imaging, 8(6), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-017-0576-z

2-Celli, V., Dolciami, M., Ninkova, R., Ercolani, G., Rizzo, S., Porpora, M. G., Catalano, C., & Manganaro, L. (2022). MRI and Adenomyosis: What Can Radiologists Evaluate?. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(10), 5840. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105840

3-Kobayashi, H., & Matsubara, S. (2020). A Classification Proposal for Adenomyosis Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Gynecologic and obstetric investigation, 85(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1159/000505690

4-Tamai, K., Togashi, K., Ito, T., Morisawa, N., Fujiwara, T., & Koyama, T. (2005). MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics, 25(1), 21-40.

5-Novellas, S., Chassang, M., Delotte, J., Toullalan, O., Chevallier, A., Bouaziz, J., & Chevallier, P. (2011). MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis. AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 196(5), 1206–1213. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4877

6- Zhai, J., Vannuccini, S., Petraglia, F., & Giudice, L. C. (2020). Adenomyosis: Mechanisms and Pathogenesis. Seminars in reproductive medicine, 38(2-03), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716687

7-Reinhold, C., Tafazoli, F., Mehio, A., Wang, L., Atri, M., Siegelman, E. S., & Rohoman, L. (1999). Uterine adenomyosis: endovaginal US and MR imaging features with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 19 Spec No, S147–S160. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.19.suppl_1.g99oc13s147

8-Bazot, M., Cortez, A., Darai, E., Rouger, J., Chopier, J., Antoine, J. M., & Uzan, S. (2001). Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 16(11), 2427–2433. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.11.2427

9- Takeuchi, M., & Matsuzaki, K. (2011). Adenomyosis: usual and unusual imaging manifestations, pitfalls, and problem-solving MR imaging techniques. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 31(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.311105110
GALLERY