Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-20435
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (educational)
Authorblock: D. I. Krimli, S. Shihata, A. A. Felemban, M. I. Alsayed, O. H. Alaslani, B. A. Bannan, Z. Alsabban, Z. Zia; Jeddah/SA
Disclosures:
Danah Ismail Krimli: Nothing to disclose
Salah Shihata: Nothing to disclose
Abdulbari Abdulkaliq Felemban: Nothing to disclose
Mohammed Ibrahim Alsayed: Nothing to disclose
Ohoud Hameed Alaslani: Nothing to disclose
Badr Abdulmajied Bannan: Nothing to disclose
Zehour Alsabban: Nothing to disclose
Zergham Zia: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Abdomen, Cardiovascular system, Emergency, CT, MR, Ultrasound, Computer Applications-Detection, diagnosis, Quality assurance
References

1. Bruno MA, Walker EA, Abujudeh HH. Understanding and confronting our mistakes: The epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics. 2015;35(6):1668–76. doi:10.1148/rg.2015150023.

2. Hawkins CM, Hall S, Zhang B, Towbin AJ. Measuring peer review performance: The impact of inter-rater reliability. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11(5):397–402. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.021.

3. Larson DB, Nance JJ. Rethinking peer review: What aviation can teach radiology about performance improvement. Radiology. 2011;259(3):626–32. doi:10.1148/radiol.10181619.

4. Rosenkrantz AB, Gandhi D, Duszak R. Discrepancy rates and clinical impact of imaging secondary interpretations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(1):33–45. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.08.013.

5. Carney E, Kempf J, DeCarvalho V, Yudd A, Nosher J. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(2):367–73. doi:10.2214/ajr.181.2.1810367.

6. Chen L, Trivedi H, Rose T, Chokshi FH, Cook TS. AI-assisted radiology reporting: Impact on discrepancy rates. Radiology. 2022;305(2):210–8. doi:10.1148/radiol.210988.

7. Itri JN, Tappouni RR, McEachern RO, Pesch AJ, Patel SH. Fundamentals of diagnostic error in imaging. Radiographics. 2018;38(6):1845–65. doi:10.1148/rg.2018180021.

8. Patel A, Anzai Y, Desai NK, Flaherty KR, Hunsaker AR, Kazerooni EA, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Chest Pain—Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5S):S2–12. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.001.

9. Lee RK, Krantz SB, Mullan BF, Siddiqui AR, Gunn ML. Refining RadPeer: A proposal for standardized subcategories. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(5):W100–6. doi:10.2214/AJR.18.20588.

10. Gupta S, Krupinski EA, Hanna TN, Carter BW, Samei E, Kimpe T, et al. Reducing inter-reviewer variability in RadPeer scoring: A multicenter study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023;221(3):1–8. doi:10.2214/AJR.22.28112.

11. Filippi CG, Schneider B, Burbank HN, Alsofrom GF, Linnell G, Ratkovits B. Discrepancy rates of radiology resident interpretations of on-call neuroradiology MR imaging studies. Radiology. 2008;249(3):972–9. doi:10.1148/radiol.2493071543.

12. Salca D, Lersy F, Willaume T, Stoessel M, Lefèvre A, Ardellier F-D, et al. Evaluation of neuroradiology emergency MRI interpretations: Low discrepancy rates between on-call radiology residents' preliminary interpretations and neuroradiologists' final reports. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(10):7260–9. doi:10.1007/s00330-022-08789-1.

13. Ruchman RB, Jaeger J, Wiggins EF, Seinfeld S, Thakral V, Bolla S, et al. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital setting. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(3):523–6. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2307.

14. Cooper VF, Goodhartz LA, Nemcek AA, Ryu RK. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: A discrepancy analysis. Acad Radiol. 2008;15(9):1198–204. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.02.011.

15. Wildman-Tobriner B, Allen BC, Maxfield CM. Common resident errors when interpreting computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis: A review of types, pitfalls, and strategies for improvement. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019;48(1):4–9. doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.12.010.

16. Meyer RE, Nickerson JP, Burbank HN, Alsofrom GF, Linnell GJ, Filippi CG. Discrepancy rates of on-call radiology residents' interpretations of CT angiography studies of the neck and circle of Willis. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(2):527–32. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.2169.

17. Chung JH, Strigel RM, Chew AR, Albrecht E, Gunn ML. Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center: An analysis and review of the literature. Acad Radiol. 2009;16(9):1155–60. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.02.017.

18. Erly WK, Berger WG, Krupinski E, Seeger JF, Guisto JA. Radiology resident evaluation of head CT scan orders in the emergency department. Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23(1):103–7.

19. Yoon LS, Haims AH, Brink JA, Rabinovici R, Forman HP. Evaluation of an emergency radiology quality assurance program at a level 1 trauma center: Abdominal and pelvic CT studies. Radiology. 2002;224(1):42–6. doi:10.1148/radiol.2241011001.

20. Kaviani H, Kazemi M, Rahman A, Amini M. Performance of a chest radiography AI algorithm in detecting missed or mislabeled findings. Diagnostics. 2022;12(9):2086. doi:10.3390/diagnostics12092086.

 
GALLERY