Congress:
ECR25
Poster Number:
C-20435
Type:
Poster: EPOS Radiologist (educational)
Authorblock:
D. I. Krimli, S. Shihata, A. A. Felemban, M. I. Alsayed, O. H. Alaslani, B. A. Bannan, Z. Alsabban, Z. Zia; Jeddah/SA
Disclosures:
Danah Ismail Krimli:
Nothing to disclose
Salah Shihata:
Nothing to disclose
Abdulbari Abdulkaliq Felemban:
Nothing to disclose
Mohammed Ibrahim Alsayed:
Nothing to disclose
Ohoud Hameed Alaslani:
Nothing to disclose
Badr Abdulmajied Bannan:
Nothing to disclose
Zehour Alsabban:
Nothing to disclose
Zergham Zia:
Nothing to disclose
Keywords:
Abdomen, Cardiovascular system, Emergency, CT, MR, Ultrasound, Computer Applications-Detection, diagnosis, Quality assurance
A retrospective review of all emergency on-call studies at a tertiary care institution over 8 weeks was conducted. Inclusion criteria included after-hours emergency cases with finalized report changes, while outpatient or inpatient studies were excluded.
The Automated Critical Result Notification System (ACRNS) flagged discrepancies between provisional and finalized reports. Four board-certified radiologists independently reviewed cases using the 2016 ACR RadPeer scoring system, which categorizes discrepancies as follows:
- 1: Concurrence.
- 2a/3a: Non-significant discrepancy (e.g., stable postoperative changes).
- 2b/3b: Clinically significant discrepancy (e.g., missed pulmonary embolism).
Cases were categorized into neuroimaging (brain/spine) or chest/abdomen studies