Congress:
ECR25
Poster Number:
C-20435
Type:
Poster: EPOS Radiologist (educational)
Authorblock:
D. I. Krimli, S. Shihata, A. A. Felemban, M. I. Alsayed, O. H. Alaslani, B. A. Bannan, Z. Alsabban, Z. Zia; Jeddah/SA
Disclosures:
Danah Ismail Krimli:
Nothing to disclose
Salah Shihata:
Nothing to disclose
Abdulbari Abdulkaliq Felemban:
Nothing to disclose
Mohammed Ibrahim Alsayed:
Nothing to disclose
Ohoud Hameed Alaslani:
Nothing to disclose
Badr Abdulmajied Bannan:
Nothing to disclose
Zehour Alsabban:
Nothing to disclose
Zergham Zia:
Nothing to disclose
Keywords:
Abdomen, Cardiovascular system, Emergency, CT, MR, Ultrasound, Computer Applications-Detection, diagnosis, Quality assurance
This study highlights two critical findings:
- Low Discrepancy Rate: Only 5.1% of provisional reports required modification, demonstrating high concordance with final interpretations.
- Persistent Inter-Reviewer Variability: 20% disagreement in RadPeer scoring, particularly in neuroimaging, underscores the need for standardized training.
These results reinforce the value of resident preliminary reports in emergency care while emphasizing opportunities to refine peer-review processes. The 64.3% significant discrepancy rate determined by independent reviewers emphasizes the need for structured training to standardize RadPeer applications, particularly in high-risk domains like neuroimaging. Future research should explore AI integration and condition-specific scoring guidelines to reduce subjectivity.