Back to the list
Congress: ECR24
Poster Number: C-15745
Type: EPOS Radiologist (educational)
DOI: 10.26044/ecr2024/C-15745
Authorblock: B. P. Paner, S. G. F. Estanislao, S. D. L. Gosiaco; Taguig City/PH
Disclosures:
Bryian Pineda Paner: Nothing to disclose
Seth Gabriel Ferrer Estanislao: Nothing to disclose
Stacey Danica Lim Gosiaco: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Abdomen, Genital / Reproductive system female, MR, Ablation procedures, Complications, Neoplasia
References
  1. Gomez E, Nguyen MT, Fursevich D, Macura K, Gupta A. MRI-based pictorial review of the FIGO classification system for uterine fibroids. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46(5):2146-2155. doi:10.1007/s00261-020-02882-z
  2. Bohlmann MK, Hoellen F, Hunold P, David M. High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids - Potential Impact on Fertility and Pregnancy Outcome. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2014 Feb;74(2):139-145. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1360311. PMID: 24741124; PMCID: PMC3973937.
  3. Szkodziak, P., Szkodziak, F., Trzeciak, K., & Czuczwar, P. (2017). Minimally invasive procedures in the management of uterine fibroids. Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 16(4), 122–125. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2017.72756
  4. Kirby JM, Burrows D, Haider E, Maizlin Z, Midia M. Utility of MRI before and after uterine fibroid embolization: why to do it and what to look for. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34(4):705-716. doi:10.1007/s00270-010-0029-2
  5. Yang, M., Rong, Y., Chen, W., Chen, J., & Wang, Z. (2021). A prediction of NPVR ≥ 80% of Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity focused ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids. Frontiers in Surgery, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.663128
  6. Yang, M., Rong, Y., Chen, W., Chen, J., & Wang, Z. (2021). A prediction of NPVR ≥ 80% of Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity focused ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids. Frontiers in Surgery, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.663128
  7. Gomez E, Nguyen MT, Fursevich D, Macura K, Gupta A. MRI-based pictorial review of the FIGO classification system for uterine fibroids. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46(5):2146-2155. doi:10.1007/s00261-020-02882-z
  8. Stewart EA, Nowak RA. Uterine Fibroids: Hiding in Plain Sight. Physiology (Bethesda). 2022 Jan 1;37(1):16-27. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00013.2021. PMID: 34964688; PMCID: PMC8742728.
  9. Yunchang Liu, Wendy Wenyi Zhang, Min He, Chunmei Gong, Bin Xie, Xiangxia Wen, Dandan Li & Lian Zhang (2018) Adverse effect analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of benign uterine diseases, International Journal of Hyperthermia, 35:1, 56-61, DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1473894
  10. Li, J. J., Xu, G. L., Gu, M. F., Luo, G. Y., Rong, Z., Wu, P. H., & Xia, J. C. (2007). Complications of high intensity focused ultrasound in patients with recurrent and metastatic abdominal tumors. World journal of gastroenterology, 13(19), 2747–2751. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i19.2747
  11. Kwok To Thomas Li and Felix Wong. (2022). Fertility and Pregnancy Outcomes after High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis: A Review. EMJ Innov. 2022;6[1]:50-54. DOI/10.33590/emjinnov/21-00047. https://doi.org/10.33590/emjinnov/21-00047.
  12. Omid Khalilzadeh et al. (2017). Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. JVIR. volume 28, issue 10, P1432-1437.E3. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.019
GALLERY