Back to the list
Congress: ECR24
Poster Number: C-12424
Type: EPOS Radiographer (scientific)
DOI: 10.26044/ecr2024/C-12424
Authorblock: A. O'Sullivan, G. A. Curran, A. Smyth, M. F. Mcentee, A. England; Cork/IE
Disclosures:
Aisling O'Sullivan: Nothing to disclose
GrĂ¡inne Alison Curran: Nothing to disclose
Aine Smyth: Nothing to disclose
Mark F. Mcentee: Nothing to disclose
Andrew England: Board Member: EFRS Advisory Board: RoClub
Keywords: Musculoskeletal spine, Plain radiographic studies, Radiation safety, Quality assurance
References
      1. European Union. Diagnostic Reference Levels in Thirty-six European Countries. Part 272.RadiatProt. 2014;180:173. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/109_en.pdf.   
      2. Mc Entee MF, Kinsella C.. The PA projection of the clavicle: a dose-reducing technique. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010;139:539–45. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncp291  
      3. Mekis N, Mc Entee MF, Stegnar P.. PA positioning significantly reduces testicular dose during sacroiliac joint radiography. Radiography. 2010;16:333–8. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2010.04.003.   
      4. Nic an Ghearr FA, Brennan PC.. The PA projection of the abdomen: A dose reducing technique. Radiography. 1998;4:195–203. doi: 10.1016/S1078-8174(98)80046-1.
      5. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71.
      6. Whiting, P.F. (2011) “Quadas-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(8), p. 529. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.
      7. Green, Christopher et al. “Lumbar spine radiographs - is it time for widespread adoption of posteroanterior projection?.” The British journal of radiology vol. 92,1103 (2019): 20190386. doi:10.1259/bjr.20190386  
      8. Chaparian, A et al. “Reduction of radiation risks in patients undergoing some X-ray examinations by using optimal projections: A Monte Carlo program-based mathematical calculation.” Journal of medical physics vol. 39,1 (2014): 32-9. doi:10.4103/0971-6203.125500  
      9. Davey, Enda, and Andrew England. "AP versus PA positioning in lumbar spine computed radiography: Image quality and individual organ doses." Radiography 21.2 (2015): 188-196.    
      10. Ben-Shlomo, Avi, et al. "Effective dose reduction in spine radiographic imaging by choosing the less radiation-sensitive side of the body." The Spine Journal 16.4 (2016): 558-563.
      11. Alukic, Erna et al. “Comparison of anteroposterior and posteroanterior projection in lumbar spine radiography.” Radiology and oncology vol. 52,4 468-474. 14 May. 2018, doi:10.2478/raon-2018-0021.

    Details of the Discipline of Medical Imaging & Radiation Therapy's wider committments at ECR2024 can be found using this link.

    Thank you - Dr Andrew England ([email protected])

GALLERY