Back to the list
Congress: ECR25
Poster Number: C-22114
Type: Poster: EPOS Radiologist (scientific)
Authorblock: A. Martin, S. Zoller, K. Pawlus, C. Paverd, T. Frauenfelder, F. Huber; Zürich/CH
Disclosures:
Alexander Martin: Nothing to disclose
Sophia Zoller: Nothing to disclose
Karolina Pawlus: Nothing to disclose
Catherine Paverd: Nothing to disclose
Thomas Frauenfelder: Nothing to disclose
Florian Huber: Nothing to disclose
Keywords: Musculoskeletal soft tissue, Ultrasound physics, MR, Ultrasound, Physics, Technology assessment, Tissue characterisation
Methods and materials

A prospective multicenter study was conducted with 34 participants (20 female, 14 male, aged 21-88) to compare ultrasound (US) and MRI for assessing muscle quality. Participants underwent whole-body MRI between 2020 and 2024, followed by ultrasound assessments of the rectus femoris (RF) and biceps brachii (BB) muscles in April 2024. Participants were selected based on specific criteria, excluding those with excessive MRI artefacts. Key factors such as age, sex, BMI, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and sarcopenia risk (using the SARC-F questionnaire) were assessed. 

MRI Measurements: Whole-body MRI was performed using a 3T scanner (Siemens Magnetom Skyra) with a T1-weighted Dixon VIBE sequence. Fat fraction (MR %FF) was calculated as:

MR %FF = (signal-fat / [signal-water + signal-fat] × 100)

Ultrasound Measurements: A Canon Aplio i800 ultrasound machine with a 7 MHz linear array was used. Standardized settings (gain: 76 dB, dynamic range: 60 dB, TGC) were applied. Attenuation imaging (ATI) was performed with a region of interest (ROI) of 2 x 2 cm and a quality indicator threshold of R² > 0.85. Participants were positioned supine for RF scans and seated for BB scans. Five consecutive measurements were taken per imaging plane, resulting in 15 images per participant (10 RF, 5 BB). Images were anonymized and saved as DICOM files for analysis.

Image Analysis:

  • MRI: Manual tracing of RF and BB muscles was used to calculate MR %FF. MRI images were segmented as per Figure 1.

    Fig 1: (A-B) Representative T1-weighted Dixon VIBE MR image tracing the cross-sectional area of the right RF on the fat-based image (left) and water-based image (right). RF = Rectus femoris, VI = Vastus intermedius, VM = Vastus medialis, F = Femur. (C-D) Representative T1-weighted Dixon VIBE MR image tracing the cross-sectional area of the right BB on the fat-based image (left) and water-based image (right). BB = Biceps brachii, H = Humerus

  • Ultrasound: Echo intensity (EI) was measured using ImageJ software, with pixel intensity ranging from 0 (black) to 255 (white). Subcutaneous fat tissue (SFT) thickness was measured at three points and averaged.

    • A correction factor was applied to EI to account for SFT thickness:

    • EI_corrected = EI_measured + 39.2297 × AT (adipose layer thickness)

    • Two formulas were used to estimate intramuscular fat from ultrasound:

  1. Young et al.3 (accounting for SFT and EI):MR %FF = [0.093 × (40 × SFT) + RF EI] + 4.698.

  2. Grozier et al. 4 (accounting for age and corrected EI):US calculated MR %FF = −3.843 + (0.065 × RF EI_corrected) + (0.145 × age).

 

Ultrasound images were segmented for measurement as seen in Figure 2.

Fig 2: (A) Ultrasound B-mode image of the RF, musculus vastus intermedius and medius. The distance between the epidermis and superficial aponeurosis is defined as subcutaneous fat tissue (SFT). (B) Segmented image of the RF, including the muscle cross-sectional area and the lines marking the SFT's thickness from the RF's lateral, central and medial aspects. The measurement of the SFT was taken at 25%, 50% and 75% of the total muscle visible on ultrasound, respectively. (C) Attenuation imaging of the RF. The green box indicates the area of interest (AOI) and should be at maximum with a depth of 10 cm. The yellow box indicates the region of interest (ROI) and should be as small as possible with a 2 x 2 cm size. It is moved on the image so that the Canon system quality indicator, R2, is greater than 0.85 and placed within the muscle. RF = Rectus femoris, VI = Vastus intermedius, VM = Vastus medialis, SFT = subcutaneous fat tissue, F = Femur (D) Ultrasound B-mode image of the BB. The distance between the epidermis and superficial aponeurosis is defined as SFT. (E) Segmented image of the BB, including the muscle cross-sectional area and the lines marking the SFT's thickness from the BB's lateral, central and medial aspects. The measurement of the SFT was taken at 25%, 50% and 75% of the length of the total muscle visible on ultrasound, respectively. (F) Attenuation imaging of the BB. The green box indicates the AOI and should be at maximum with a depth of 10 cm. The yellow box indicates the ROI and should be as small as possible, with a size of 2 x 2 cm. It is moved on the image so that R2 is greater than 0.85 and as high as possible. BB = Biceps brachii, SFT = subcutaneous fat tissue, H = Humerus

GALLERY